Arbitral Digest

Matter

Orabelle v Orzenia (Dubai International Financial Centre Courts ARB 007/2026)

DIFC proceedings concerning a Paris-seated arbitration addressed a worldwide freezing order and asset disclosure, dismissed for lack of a DIFC jurisdictional nexus.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Interim measures
  • Asset tracing and recovery
Seat
France

Procedural record

  1. 21 January 2026United Arab Emirates

    21 January 2026United Arab Emirates

    Reasons for Order of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts in the case ARB 007/2026 dated 21 January 2026

    Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Court of First Instance

    Decision summary
    The Court dismissed Orabelle’s urgent ex-parte application for a worldwide freezing order up to USD 8,071,581.39, an asset-disclosure order, and related service relief. It held that the Applicant had not established the jurisdictional foundation under Article 15(4) of Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025 because no asset or other relevant nexus within the DIFC was identified, and the proposed relief was directed in substance at assets outside the DIFC.

    Participants

    Orabelle
    Orzenia
    Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Court of First Instance
    Judge
    Shamlan Al Sawalehi

    Authorities cited

    4
    • Dubai Law No. 2 of 2025 concerning the DIFC
      statute
    • Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC)
      rules
    • DIFC Arbitration Law
      statute
    • Trafigura
      case

Matter record

Report a correction

Orabelle v Orzenia (Dubai International Financial Centre Courts ARB 007/2026) · Matter