Matter

Osaühing ProInkasso v OÜ PROKTER (Tallinn Court of Appeal, case 2-20-3168/118, 27 May 2022)

ProInkasso's restitution dispute with Prokter, concerning mortgage payments and the effect of a Riga arbitral award declaring the mortgage agreement invalid.

International commercial arbitration
Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
Interim measures

1 November 2018Arbitration
1 November 2018Arbitration
Award of the Riga International Arbitration Court in case 73/18 dated 1 November 2018
Decision summary
The tribunal declared the mortgage agreement between SIA Meža Properties and OÜ PROKTER invalid and ordered OÜ PROKTER to remove the mortgages.
Participants
SIA Meža Properties
OÜ PROKTER
Mentioned in judgment
1 year, 6 months and 10 days later · 557 days
11 May 2020Estonia
11 May 2020Estonia
Order of the Harju County Court dated 11 May 2020
Harju County Court
Decision summary
The court imposed interim measures including judicial mortgages in the proceedings.
Mentioned in judgment
8 months and 7 days later · 252 days
18 January 2021Estonia
18 January 2021Estonia
Order of the Harju County Court dated 18 January 2021
Harju County Court
Decision summary
The court partly granted OÜ PROKTER's application for security for its expected procedural costs.
Mentioned in judgment
10 months and 12 days later · 316 days
30 November 2021Estonia
30 November 2021Estonia
Decision of the Harju County Court dated 30 November 2021
Harju County Court
Decision summary
The court dismissed Osaühing ProInkasso's claim against OÜ PROKTER, allocated the proceedings costs to ProInkasso, determined PROKTER's recoverable costs at EUR 11,954.44, and cancelled the interim measures.
Participants
Osaühing ProInkasso
OÜ PROKTER
Harju County Court
Mentioned in judgment
5 months and 17 days later · 168 days
17 May 2022Estonia
17 May 2022Estonia
Order of the Tallinn Court of Appeal dated 17 May 2022
Tallinn Court of Appeal
Decision summary
The court replaced one judicial mortgage securing the proceedings with EUR 60,400 paid into the court account as security.
Mentioned in judgment
10 days later · 10 days
27 May 2022Estonia
27 May 2022Estonia
Decision of the Tallinn Court of Appeal in case 2-20-3168/118 dated 27 May 2022
Tallinn Court of Appeal
Decision summary
The court dismissed Osaühing ProInkasso's appeal and left the dismissal of its EUR 425,000 unjust-enrichment claim against OÜ PROKTER in force, while supplementing the first-instance reasoning. It allocated the trial and appellate costs to ProInkasso, awarded PROKTER EUR 1,704 in appellate costs, and directed that EUR 6,240 of the first-instance costs be paid from security already deposited.
Participants
Osaühing ProInkasso
Representative
Rene Varul (For: Osaühing ProInkasso)
OÜ PROKTER
Representative
Annika Vait (For: OÜ PROKTER)
Representative
Siret Siilbek (For: OÜ PROKTER)
Tallinn Court of Appeal
Judge
Mati Maksing
Judge
Gaida Kivinurm
Judge
Andres Suik
Authorities cited
9
- Estonian Code of Civil Procedure (TsMS) (Tsiviilkohtumenetluse seadustik)
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act (Võlaõigusseadus)
  statute
- Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (Rome II Regulation) (Regulation (EC) No 864/2007)
  regulation
- Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I Regulation) (Regulation (EC) No 593/2008)
  regulation
- Latvian Civil Law (Civillikums) (Civillikums)
  statute
- Latvian Commercial Law (Komerclikums) (Komerclikums)
  statute
- Latvian Civil Procedure Law (Civilprocesa likums) (Civilprocesa likums)
  statute
- Supreme Court of Estonia order of 23 March 2016 in civil case 3-2-1-184-15 (Civil case 3-2-1-184-15)
  case
- Supreme Court of Estonia judgment of 2 February 2022 in civil case 2-20-6269 (Civil case 2-20-6269)
  case
Source

Procedural record

Participants

SIA Meža Properties

OÜ PROKTER

Participants

Osaühing ProInkasso

OÜ PROKTER

Harju County Court

Participants

Osaühing ProInkasso

OÜ PROKTER

Tallinn Court of Appeal

Authorities cited