Matter

PLM Group Eesti OÜ v OÜ ISTREK (Harju Maakohus Tallinna kohtumaja 2-24-15197/7)

9 October 2025Estonia
9 October 2025Estonia
Decision of Harju Maakohus Tallinna kohtumaja in the case 2-24-15197/7 dated 9 October 2025
Harju Maakohus Tallinna kohtumaja
Decision summary
The court rejected the defendant's request to dismiss the claim because the alleged Swedish-law and Swedish-arbitration terms were not incorporated into the contract. It dismissed the claimant's claim for EUR 3,360 in maintenance fees and EUR 384.59 in default interest, holding that the non-renewal and unilateral price-increase terms were invalid standard terms and that the defendant had notified the claimant before the contract expired. The claimant was ordered to bear the procedural costs and pay the defendant EUR 3,453.40 in legal costs, with statutory interest from the decision's becoming final until payment.
Supporting details
12 authorities · 5 participants
PLM Group Eesti OÜ
Representative
Ahto Järvela (For: PLM Group Eesti OÜ)
OÜ ISTREK
Representative
Kaido Uduste (For: OÜ ISTREK)
Harju Maakohus Tallinna kohtumaja
Judge
Anu Uritam
Authorities cited
12
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 8
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 35
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 37
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 41
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 42
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 44
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 113
  statute
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act § 619
  statute
- Estonian Code of Civil Procedure § 162
  statute
- Estonian Code of Civil Procedure § 174
  statute
- Estonian Code of Civil Procedure § 284
  statute
- Estonian Code of Civil Procedure § 371
  statute
Direct judgment