Arbitral Digest

Matter

Qatar Holding LLC v Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd and another (Singapore High Court OA 302/2024; [2026] SGHC 217)

Dispute arising from Qatar Holding’s US$150m financing of Byju’s Investments’ acquisition of Aakash shares, with consolidated SIAC arbitration and Singapore court proceedings concerning the award, asset disclosure, freezing orders, and contempt.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
  • Asset tracing and recovery
  • Interim measures
  • Cross-border litigation
Case no.
SIAC Arbitration Nos. 093 and 094 of 2024 (consolidated)
Applicable rules
SIAC Rules (6th Ed, 1 August 2016)

Procedural record

  1. 28 March 2024Arbitration

    28 March 2024Arbitration

    Emergency arbitrator’s orders dated 28 March 2024

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The emergency arbitrator froze the respondents’ worldwide assets and required them to disclose their worldwide assets on affidavit.

    Participants

    Qatar Holding LLC
    Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd
    Byju Raveendran
    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    1 year, 2 months and 1 day later · 427 days

  2. 29 May 2025Arbitration

    29 May 2025Arbitration

    Tribunal’s production order dated 29 May 2025

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal ordered both respondents to produce nine categories of documents and information about their assets and to take specified steps to retrieve responsive material.

    Participants

    Qatar Holding LLC
    Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd
    Byju Raveendran
    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    1 month and 15 days later · 46 days

  3. 14 July 2025Arbitration

    14 July 2025Arbitration

    Partial final award dated 14 July 2025

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal ordered the respondents jointly and severally to pay Qatar Holding about US$235m with interest and reserved jurisdiction over continuing freezing relief and costs.

    Participants

    Qatar Holding LLC
    Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd
    Byju Raveendran
    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    2 months and 16 days later · 78 days

  4. 30 September 2025Arbitration

    30 September 2025Arbitration

    Tribunal’s freezing order dated 30 September 2025

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal continued the emergency arbitrator’s freezing order on an interim basis pending the respondents’ response, expressly encompassing the Aakash shares held by Beeaar Investco Pte Ltd.

    Participants

    Qatar Holding LLC
    Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd
    Byju Raveendran
    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    1 year and 20 days later · 385 days

  5. 20 October 2026Singapore

    20 October 2026Singapore

    Judgment of the General Division of the High Court of Singapore in the case HC/OA 302/2024 (SUM 793/2026) dated 20 October 2026

    General Division of the High Court of Singapore

    Case no.
    HC/OA 302/2024 (SUM 793/2026)
    Citation
    [2026] SGHC 217
    Decision summary
    The court found Byju Raveendran guilty of contempt for intentionally breaching three Singapore court orders enforcing arbitral orders: freezing and asset-disclosure orders and a production order. It committed him to six months’ imprisonment, made consequential restoration and disclosure orders, ordered fresh disclosure and production, and awarded Qatar Holding LLC S$90,000 in costs.

    Participants

    Application
    Application for an order of committal for contempt in HC/SUM 793/2026 — Granted
    Application
    Application in HC/SUM 1539/2026 to hear the committal proceedings in private, permit cross-examination, and adjourn the hearing — Dismissed
    Qatar Holding LLC
    Representative
    Cavinder Bull SC (For: Qatar Holding LLC)
    Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd
    Byju Raveendran
    Representative
    Clarence Lun (For: Byju Raveendran)
    Representative
    Prakaash Silvam (For: Byju Raveendran)
    General Division of the High Court of Singapore
    Judge
    Vinodh Coomaraswamy

    Authorities cited

    10
    • International Arbitration Act 1994 (Singapore) (International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed))
      statute
    • Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (Singapore) (Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (2020 Rev Ed))
      statute
    • Companies Act 1967 (Singapore) (Companies Act 1967 (2020 Rev Ed))
      statute
    • Evidence Act 1893 (Singapore) (Evidence Act 1893 (2020 Rev Ed))
      statute
    • Rules of Court 2021 (Singapore) (Rules of Court 2021)
      rules
    • Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd v Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd ([2024] 4 SLR 1347)
      case
    • Wei Ho-Hung v Lyu Jun ([2025] 1 SLR 950)
      case
    • Mok Kah Hong v Zheng Zhuan Yao ([2016] 3 SLR 1)
      case
    • Energy & Commodity Pte Ltd v BTS Tankers Pte Ltd ([2021] 2 SLR 877)
      case
    • Suntech International Pte Ltd v Vena Energy Eretz Pte Ltd ([2020] SGCA 27)
      case

Matter record

Report a correction

Qatar Holding LLC v Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd and another (Singapore High Court OA 302/2024; [2026] SGHC 217) · Matter