Matter
Miglionico Angela v Sun World International LLC (Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation), case 25489/2022, Sentenza No. 9429/2024)
- 20 April 2018Arbitration
20 April 2018Arbitration
Partial arbitral award of 20 April 2018
Milan Chamber of Arbitration
- Decision summary
- The arbitral tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to decide the dispute arising from the parties’ contract.
Supporting details
2 participantsSun World International LLC
Miglionico Angela
Milan Chamber of Arbitration
8 months and 18 days later · 262 days
- 7 January 2019Arbitration
7 January 2019Arbitration
Final arbitral award of 7 January 2019
Milan Chamber of Arbitration
- Decision summary
- The tribunal found that Miglionico breached the contract by selling Scarlotta Seedless grapes to unauthorized distributors, declared the contract terminated for her fault, ordered removal of the Sugranineteen plants, awarded Sun World nominal damages of EUR 1, and allocated legal and arbitration costs between the parties; it rejected the remaining claims.
Supporting details
2 participantsSun World International LLC
Miglionico Angela
Milan Chamber of Arbitration
3 years, 6 months and 29 days later · 1306 days
- 5 August 2022Italy
5 August 2022Italy
Decision of the Milan Court of Appeal in the case 2704/2022 dated 5 August 2022
Milan Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The Court of Appeal rejected the challenge to the partial award and declared the challenge to the final award, and Sun World’s cross-appeal, inadmissible and/or unfounded. It ordered Miglionico to pay three quarters of Sun World’s litigation costs, assessed at EUR 7,136.25 plus applicable additional amounts.
Supporting details
4 authorities · 2 participantsAngela Miglionico
Sun World International LLC
Milan Court of Appeal
- Date not availableItaly
Date not availableItaly
Decision of the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) in the case 25489/2022 (Sentenza No. 9429/2024)
Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation)
- Decision summary
- The Court of Cassation upheld Angela Miglionico’s appeal on the second ground and declared the first ground inadmissible. It quashed the Milan Court of Appeal’s judgment insofar as it rejected the challenge based on the Community plant variety protection rules, holding that a contractual clause giving the rights holder control over purchasers of fruit produced from authorized plant variety constituents is contrary to public policy under Article 13(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No. 2100/94 as interpreted by the Court of Justice. The case was remanded to the Milan Court of Appeal in a different composition for a new examination.
Supporting details
8 authorities · 8 participantsAngela Miglionico
- Representative
- Francesco Saverio Costantino (For: Angela Miglionico)
Sun World International LLC
- Representative
- Fabrizio Jacobacci (For: Sun World International LLC)
- Representative
- Emanuela Truffo (For: Sun World International LLC)
- Representative
- Claudia Scapicchio (For: Sun World International LLC)
Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation)
- Judge
- Eduardo Campese
- Advocate General
- Rita Sanlorenzo