Arbitral Digest

Matter

Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd v Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (SIAC Arbitration No 166 of 2022)

Singapore SIAC construction arbitration between Wan Sern Metal Industries and Hua Tian Engineering concerned subcontract termination, payment and award review.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Setting aside arbitral awards
  • Construction arbitration
  • UNCITRAL Model Law
  • Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements
Case no.
SIAC Arbitration No 166 of 2022
Seat
Singapore
Applicable rules
SIAC Rules (6th Ed, 1 August 2016)

Procedural record

  1. 31 July 2023Singapore

    31 July 2023Singapore

    Arbitral Award dated 31 July 2023

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The arbitrator found that Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd was not entitled to terminate the subcontract, dismissed its claims, and allowed most of Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd's counterclaims, including a balance-work counterclaim of $776,694.51 and retention money of $90,780.07.

    Participants

    Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd
    Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd
    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    1 year, 6 months and 13 days later · 563 days

  2. 13 February 2025Singapore

    13 February 2025Singapore

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore in the case Civil Appeal No 10 of 2024 dated 13 February 2025

    Court of Appeal of Singapore

    Case no.
    Civil Appeal No 10 of 2024
    Citation
    [2025] SGCA 5
    Decision summary
    The court allowed the appeal in part and set aside the arbitral award insofar as it concerned the balance-work counterclaim, holding that the arbitrator had failed to apply her mind to the parties' cases on an unpleaded expectation-damages issue and thereby breached natural justice. The court did not set aside the award on the other grounds raised.

    Participants

    Application
    Application to set aside the arbitral award — Allowed in part
    Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd
    Representative
    Ashok Kumar Rai (For: Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd)
    Representative
    Yeo Wei Ying Jolyn (For: Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd)
    Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd
    Representative
    Daniel Tay Yi Ming (For: Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd)
    Representative
    Lee Yun Long (For: Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd)
    Court of Appeal of Singapore
    Judge
    Sundaresh Menon
    Judge
    Steven Chong
    Judge
    Judith Prakash

    Authorities cited

    11
    • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
      model-law
    • Singapore Arbitration Act 2001
      statute
    • Singapore International Arbitration Act 1994
      statute
    • Singapore Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004
      statute
    • Singapore Rules of Court 2021
      statute
    • China Machine New Energy Corp v Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC and another ([2020] 1 SLR 695)
      case-law
    • AKN and another v ALC and others and other appeals ([2015] 3 SLR 488)
      case-law
    • AKN and another v ALC and others and other appeals ([2016] 1 SLR 966)
      case-law
    • L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd and another appeal ([2013] 1 SLR 125)
      case-law
    • Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd ([2007] 3 SLR (R) 86)
      case-law
    • CAJ and another v CAI and another appeal ([2022] 1 SLR 505)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd v Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (SIAC Arbitration No 166 of 2022) · Matter