Matter
ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA v Ministry of Defence of Ukraine (Kyiv Court of Appeal case 824/1/26; arbitral case 178/2024)
ICAC arbitration between ARDIX and the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine led to an award of 14 February 2025. The Kyiv Court of Appeal left the enforcement application without movement for court-fee and arbitration-agreement defects, then left it without consideration on 23 June 2026.
Procedural record
- 14 February 2025Arbitration
14 February 2025Arbitration
Award of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in case 178/2024 dated 14 February 2025
International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- Award no.
- 178/2024
Participants
ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- Institutional administrator
- International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
11 months later · 334 days
- 14 January 2026UkraineText
14 January 2026Ukraine
Ruling of Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case 824/1/26 dated 14 January 2026
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The court left A's application to recognise and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the 14 February 2025 arbitral award without movement because the court fee had been paid in an insufficient amount. It required A to pay an additional UAH 150.00 within five days, failing which the application would be treated as not filed and returned.
Participants
A
- Representative
- OSOBA 1 (For: A)
B
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Judge
- R. V. Berezovenko
1 month and 18 days later · 49 days
- 4 March 2026Ukraine
4 March 2026Ukraine
Ruling of Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case 824/1/26 dated 4 March 2026
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The court listed ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA’s application to recognise and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the 14 February 2025 arbitral award for hearing.
Participants
ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
- Representative
- Yana Hennadiyevna Kudina (For: ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA)
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
- Representative
- Yuriy Yuriyovych Gulevaty (For: Ministry of Defence of Ukraine)
- Representative
- V. V. Sukhovyi (For: Ministry of Defence of Ukraine)
Kyiv Court of Appeal
2 months and 15 days later · 76 days
- 19 May 2026UkraineText
19 May 2026Ukraine
Ruling of Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case 824/1/26 dated 19 May 2026
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The court left ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA’s application to recognise and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the 14 February 2025 arbitral award without movement. It granted five days from 19 May 2026 to remedy the failure to provide the original or a notarised copy of the arbitration agreement.
Participants
ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
- Representative
- Yana Hennadiyevna Kudina (For: ARDIX SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA)
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
- Representative
- Yuriy Yuriyovych Gulevaty (For: Ministry of Defence of Ukraine)
- Representative
- V. V. Sukhovyi (For: Ministry of Defence of Ukraine)
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Judge
- R. V. Berezovenko
- Court Secretary
- S. R. Shchavlinskyi
1 month and 4 days later · 35 days
- 23 June 2026UkraineText
23 June 2026Ukraine
Ruling of Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case 824/1/26 dated 23 June 2026
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The court left A's application to recognise and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the 14 February 2025 arbitral award without consideration because A did not cure the identified defects in the arbitration-agreement documents within the prescribed period.
Participants
A
- Representative
- OSOBA 1 (For: A)
B
- Representative
- OSOBA 2 (For: B)
- Representative
- OSOBA 4 (For: B)
Kyiv Court of Appeal
- Judge
- R. V. Berezovenko
- Court Secretary
- S. R. Shchavlinskyi