Arbitral Digest

Matter

GAIJIN NETWORK LTD v EVGENY OLEGOCIVH (Nicosia District Court Application No. 11F/2026)

Seat
United Kingdom
Applicable rules
ICC Arbitration Rules
  1. 11 June 2026Cyprus

    11 June 2026Cyprus

    Decision of the Nicosia District Court in Application No. 11F/2026 dated 11 June 2026

    Nicosia District Court

    Case no.
    Application No. 11F/2026
    Citation
    Application No. 11F/2026, decision of 11 June 2026
    Decision summary
    The Nicosia District Court dismissed Gaijin Network Ltd’s ex parte application for interim relief against Evgeny Olegocivh in support of intended London ICC arbitration. The court held that the requested Norwich Pharmacal disclosure orders and mandatory and prohibitory orders could not be granted under the applicable statutory framework; it also directed attention to the emergency-arbitrator mechanism in the ICC Rules.

    Supporting details

    22 authorities · 5 participants
    GAIJIN NETWORK LTD
    Representative
    Papagianni (For: GAIJIN NETWORK LTD)
    Representative
    Dr. K. Chrysostomidis & Co. D.E.P.E. (For: GAIJIN NETWORK LTD)
    EVGENY OLEGOCIVH
    Nicosia District Court

    Authorities cited

    22
    • Courts of Justice Law No. 14/60
      statute
    • Cyprus Civil Procedure Rules 2023
      statute
    • Collier v Bennett [2020] EWHC 1884
      case law
    • Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd v Afrasia Bank Ltd (Mauritius) [2023] UKPC 35
      case law
    • AQR Capital Management LLC and others v The London Metal Exchange and another [2022] EWHC 3313 (Comm)
      case law
    • Sarayiah v Williams [2017] EWHC 2918 (Ch)
      case law
    • Gorbachev v Guriev [2022] EWCA 1270
      case law
    • Hague Evidence Convention
      treaty
    • Nix v Emerdata Ltd [2022] EWHC 718 (Comm)
      case law
    • Cyprus International Commercial Arbitration Law No. 101/1987
      statute
    • In the Matter of the Application of Finvision Holdings Limited, Civil Application 57/2018
      case law
    • Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35
      case law
    • The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87
      case law
    • Donohue v. Armco [2001] UKHL 64
      case law
    • West Tankers Inc v. Allianz SpA (Case 185/07) [2009] 1 AC 1138
      case law
    • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985
      other
    • Attorney General of Kenya v Bank Fur Arbeit Und Wirtschaft AG (1999) 1 AAD 585
      case law
    • Arbitration Act 1996
      statute
    • Senior Courts Act 1981
      statute
    • Southport Success S.A. v. Tsingshan Holding Group Co. Ltd [2015] HC 1974 (Comm)
      case law
    • Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited v. Sulpico Lines Inc [2008] EWHC 914 (Comm)
      case law
    • U & M Mining Zambia Ltd v. Konkola Copper Mines plc [2013] EWHC 260 (Comm)
      case law

Matter record

Report a correction

GAIJIN NETWORK LTD v EVGENY OLEGOCIVH (Nicosia District Court Application No. 11F/2026) · Matter